History Taking · Intermediate · Respiratory

Progressive Breathlessness and Chest Pain

Practise this PLAB 2 history taking station on Mesothelioma. 8-minute voice AI simulation with feedback on all 3 marking domains.

Clinical scenario

You are an FY2 doctor in a hospital clinic. Mr Derek Wilson, a 68-year-old man, presents with six months of progressive dyspnea, chest wall pain, and persistent cough. He has significant occupational asbestos exposure from working 40 years in insulation manufacturing. Please take a focused history and discuss initial investigation, prognosis, and supportive management.

Background notes: PMH: Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes

What this station tests

  • Detailed occupational history: nature of exposure, duration, protective equipment, latency period, and household secondary exposure
  • Differentiating mesothelioma from lung cancer: pleural-based versus parenchymal presentations, smoking interaction (synergistic for lung cancer, independent for mesothelioma)
  • Communicating a suspected asbestos-related malignancy with honesty and compassion: naming the concern without premature definitive diagnosis
  • Mentioning industrial injuries compensation: practical support that is often overlooked but highly relevant to the patient
  • Recognising the emotional complexity: guilt about not leaving the job, anger at the employer, fear of dying, and the need for honest information

How to use your 8 minutes

  • 0-1 min — Introduction: Introduce yourself, confirm identity, open question. 'What's brought you in today?'
  • 1-4 min — Systematic History: Presenting complaint detail (SOCRATES for pain, timeline, severity). Systems review. PMH, medications, allergies.
  • 4-6 min — Context and ICE: Social history (smoking, alcohol, occupation, living situation). Family history. Ideas, Concerns, Expectations.
  • 6-7 min — Summary and Plan: Summarise findings back to patient. Share differential/working diagnosis. Outline investigation and management plan.
  • 7-8 min — Closing: Safety netting with specific red flags. Arrange follow-up. Check for questions.

Consultation approach

The opening

Progressive breathlessness with chest wall pain and significant occupational exposure demands a thorough occupational history as the first priority. The candidate must recognise asbestos exposure as a critical risk factor and link it to the clinical presentation. Mr Wilson is 68, presenting with six months of progressive dyspnoea, chest wall pain, and persistent cough. He worked in insulation manufacturing for 40 years. Open with: 'Mr Wilson, tell me about your breathing and how things have changed over the past few months.' Let the severity of his functional decline emerge before addressing the occupational history.

Core approach

The clinical picture is concerning. Dyspnoea has progressed from exertional to rest over six months. He can no longer walk 100 metres to the shops. He is developing orthopnoea and waking gasping. He has sharp, right-sided chest wall pain that is pleuritic (worse on breathing and coughing), sometimes radiating to his shoulder. Persistent dry cough for six months. Weight loss of approximately 10kg (unintentional, clothes hanging loose). Fatigue and reduced appetite. These features, progressive breathlessness, chest wall pain, weight loss, in a patient with occupational asbestos exposure, raise mesothelioma as a primary concern.

Take a detailed occupational history. He worked in insulation manufacturing from 1965 to 2000, handling asbestos products directly. Protective equipment was inadequate for much of this period. The latency period for mesothelioma is typically 20 to 50 years, and he is now 68 with exposure starting at age 23. Ask about household exposure: did he bring work clothes home (secondary exposure to wife). Ask whether colleagues have developed similar illnesses.

Differentiate from lung cancer (which is also possible with asbestos exposure). Mesothelioma typically presents with pleural-based symptoms (chest wall pain, effusion, breathlessness from fluid), while lung cancer presents more commonly with cough, haemoptysis, and central mass effects. Both are possible. Ask about smoking: if he smoked, the combination of asbestos and smoking synergistically increases lung cancer risk (but mesothelioma risk is independent of smoking).

ICE: He suspects something serious related to asbestos. He feels guilty about not leaving the job earlier. He is angry with his employer for not protecting workers. He is terrified of dying. He wants honest information.

Closing and safety netting

Communicating a suspected serious diagnosis related to occupational exposure requires honesty, sensitivity, and practical information. 'Mr Wilson, given your symptoms, the weight loss, and your significant asbestos exposure over 40 years, I am concerned about the possibility of a condition called mesothelioma, which is a type of cancer of the lining around the lung related to asbestos. We need urgent investigations to confirm this.'

Investigations: urgent chest X-ray (likely to show pleural effusion and/or pleural thickening), CT chest with contrast, blood tests, and referral to the respiratory team. He will likely need a pleural biopsy for definitive diagnosis.

If he asks about prognosis, be honest but compassionate. Mesothelioma is serious and treatment options are limited, but a specialist team will discuss all available options including chemotherapy, symptom management, and supportive care. Mention the legal and compensation aspect: 'You may be entitled to industrial injuries compensation because of your occupational exposure. I can point you toward the right support for that.' This is often overlooked but is very important to patients. Safety net: if breathing worsens significantly before his appointment, attend A&E. Ask who he would like to bring to the hospital appointment.

How examiners mark this station

Examiners will focus on the thoroughness and structure of your history taking for mesothelioma. Domain 1 (Data Gathering) carries the most weight: expect marks for systematic coverage of presenting complaint, red flags, PMH, medications, social and family history. Domain 2 (Clinical Management) requires a clear differential, appropriate investigations, and a safe management plan with safety netting. Domain 3 (Interpersonal Skills) is assessed throughout: genuine exploration of ICE, active listening, empathic responses, and clear communication without jargon.

Domain 1: Data Gathering, Technical and Assessment Skills (Primary focus)

Scores well: Detailed occupational history: nature of work, asbestos type, duration, latency, protective equipment. Constitutional symptom quantification: weight loss, appetite, fatigue. Chest wall pain characterisation (pleuritic, lateralised). Smoking history for synergistic risk assessment. Household exposure enquiry.

Costs marks: Superficial occupational history. Not quantifying weight loss. Not asking about smoking. Not considering household exposure.

Domain 2: Clinical Management Skills (Primary focus)

Scores well: Naming mesothelioma as the concern with clear rationale. Urgent investigation plan: CXR, CT, bloods, respiratory referral. Mentioning industrial injuries compensation. Honest but compassionate prognosis discussion when asked. Appropriate safety netting.

Costs marks: Not naming the suspected diagnosis. Treating as COPD exacerbation. Not arranging urgent investigation. Not mentioning compensation. Being evasive about prognosis.

Domain 3: Interpersonal Skills (Primary focus)

Scores well: Responding to his guilt about not leaving the job. Acknowledging his anger at his employer. Honest communication about a serious diagnosis. Asking who he wants at the hospital appointment. Practical support alongside clinical management.

Costs marks: Being evasive when he asks 'is it cancer?' Not acknowledging his emotional state. Ignoring the occupational injustice dimension. Cold, procedural delivery of a life-changing diagnosis.

Common examiner feedback (and how to fix it)

Did not gather sufficient information to make an adequate assessment of the patient's condition

Fix: Use a consistent framework for every history. After covering the presenting complaint, systematically move through PMH, drug history, social history, family history, and ICE. Keep a mental checklist.

Did not identify the patient's problems and/or did not develop a management plan adequately

Fix: Reserve the final 2 minutes to summarise your findings, share your working diagnosis with the patient, and outline your investigation and management plan including safety netting.

Common mistakes in this station

  1. Not taking a detailed occupational history. A 68-year-old with progressive breathlessness, chest wall pain, and weight loss who worked in insulation manufacturing for 40 years has asbestos exposure that must be explored in detail. Candidates who note 'retired engineer' without asking what materials he worked with miss the key aetiological link.
  2. Not asking about household exposure. Asbestos fibres on work clothing can cause secondary exposure to family members. Asking whether his wife was exposed through laundry or home contact demonstrates thorough risk assessment.
  3. Not mentioning compensation. Mesothelioma is an industrial disease with specific compensation pathways. Candidates who discuss the medical aspects without mentioning the legal entitlement miss a practical support element that matters to the patient.

Resitting PLAB 2?

If you have previously struggled with history taking stations, focus on building a consistent systematic framework that you apply to every case. Practise structuring your history into clear phases (presenting complaint, systems review, PMH, social, ICE) so that even under pressure, you cover all domains. Many resitters lose marks not on knowledge but on organisation and time management.

Example opening

Good morning/afternoon, my name is Dr [Name], I'm one of the doctors here today. Could I confirm your name and date of birth please? Thank you. So, what's brought you in to see me today?

Frequently asked questions

How do I approach the consultation in this mesothelioma station?

Progressive breathlessness with chest wall pain and significant occupational exposure demands a thorough occupational history as the first priority. The candidate must recognise asbestos exposure as a critical risk factor and link it to the clinical presentation. Mr Wilson is 68, presenting with six months of progressive dyspnoea, chest wall pain, and persistent cough.

What does a strong performance look like to the examiner in this station?

Strong performances show: Detailed occupational history: nature of work, asbestos type, duration, latency, protective equipment. Constitutional symptom quantification: weight loss, appetite, fatigue. Weak performances: Superficial occupational history. Not quantifying weight loss. Not asking about smoking. Not considering household exposure.

What is the biggest pitfall in this mesothelioma station?

Not taking a detailed occupational history. A 68-year-old with progressive breathlessness, chest wall pain, and weight loss who worked in insulation manufacturing for 40 years has asbestos exposure that must be explored in detail. Candidates who note 'retired engineer' without asking what materials he worked with miss the key aetiological link.

How should I prepare for mesothelioma if I have never seen it in practice?

This station rewards process over personal experience. The skill being assessed: Differentiating mesothelioma from lung cancer: pleural-based versus parenchymal presentations, smoking interaction (synergistic for lung cancer, independent for mesothelioma). Use the domain breakdown on this page to target your preparation, then practise the station aloud so your structure survives exam pressure.

Related cases