History Taking · Intermediate · O&G

Postmenopausal Vaginal Bleeding

Practise this PLAB 2 history taking station on Postmenopausal Bleeding. 8-minute voice AI simulation with feedback on all 3 marking domains.

Clinical scenario

You are an FY2 doctor in a GP practice. Mrs Ivy Corbett, a 61-year-old woman, has come to see you about vaginal bleeding. She had her last menstrual period ten years ago and has been post-menopausal since. She has noticed light vaginal bleeding over the past week. She is worried it might be something serious, particularly cancer. Please take a focused history, assess risk factors for endometrial cancer, and arrange appropriate urgent referral for investigation.

Background notes: PMH: Fit and well, no chronic conditions, no previous cancer, IUD contraception previously (removed age 51)

What this station tests

  • 2-week-wait referral for all postmenopausal bleeding: NICE NG12 mandatory
  • Endometrial cancer as the primary diagnosis to exclude: commonest serious cause of PMB
  • Atrophic vaginitis as the commonest benign cause: but cancer must be excluded first
  • Transvaginal USS and endometrial biopsy as the investigation pathway
  • Family history of endometrial cancer: increases both risk and anxiety

How to use your 8 minutes

  • 0-1 min — Introduction: Introduce yourself, confirm identity, open question. 'What's brought you in today?'
  • 1-4 min — Systematic History: Presenting complaint detail (SOCRATES for pain, timeline, severity). Systems review. PMH, medications, allergies.
  • 4-6 min — Context and ICE: Social history (smoking, alcohol, occupation, living situation). Family history. Ideas, Concerns, Expectations.
  • 6-7 min — Summary and Plan: Summarise findings back to patient. Share differential/working diagnosis. Outline investigation and management plan.
  • 7-8 min — Closing: Safety netting with specific red flags. Arrange follow-up. Check for questions.

Consultation approach

The opening

Postmenopausal bleeding is endometrial cancer until proven otherwise and requires urgent 2-week-wait referral. Mrs Corbett is 61, last period 8 years ago, with 1 week of vaginal bleeding. She is a retired nurse and is terrified of cancer. Open with: 'Mrs Corbett, any bleeding after menopause is something we investigate urgently. Tell me about what you have noticed.'

Core approach

Characterise the bleeding. Light spotting for 1 week. Fresh blood, not old. No abdominal pain. No discharge. No recent sexual activity that could explain contact bleeding. Last period 8 years ago (well past menopause). She is not on HRT. This is postmenopausal bleeding and must be investigated.

The most important differential is endometrial cancer (commonest cause of PMB requiring exclusion). Other causes: atrophic vaginitis (commonest benign cause), endometrial polyp, cervical pathology, vulval pathology. Ask about cervical screening status (up to date? Last result?). Any vaginal dryness or atrophy symptoms?

She is a retired nurse and suspects cancer. Her mother had endometrial cancer. This family history increases her anxiety and her objective risk.

Closing and safety netting

2-week-wait referral per NICE NG12: all women over 55 with unexplained postmenopausal bleeding need urgent referral for transvaginal ultrasound and possible endometrial biopsy. 'Mrs Corbett, I am referring you on the urgent pathway. This means you should be seen within two weeks. The ultrasound will measure the lining of your womb, and if it is thickened, a biopsy will be taken.'

Address cancer anxiety proportionately. 'There are many causes of postmenopausal bleeding, and cancer is only one of them. Atrophic changes from menopause are the commonest cause. But because cancer is a possibility, we always investigate thoroughly.' Safety net: 'If the bleeding becomes heavy or you develop pain, go to A&E.' Follow-up after gynaecology assessment.

How examiners mark this station

Examiners will focus on the thoroughness and structure of your history taking for postmenopausal bleeding. Domain 1 (Data Gathering) carries the most weight: expect marks for systematic coverage of presenting complaint, red flags, PMH, medications, social and family history. Domain 2 (Clinical Management) requires a clear differential, appropriate investigations, and a safe management plan with safety netting. Domain 3 (Interpersonal Skills) is assessed throughout: genuine exploration of ICE, active listening, empathic responses, and clear communication without jargon.

Domain 1 (Primary focus)

Scores well: PMB confirmed. Timing and character documented. Cervical screening status checked. Family history noted. Other causes considered.

Costs marks: Not confirming PMB. Not checking screening. Missing family history.

Domain 2 (Primary focus)

Scores well: 2-week-wait referral. TVS and biopsy pathway explained. Proportionate cancer risk communication. Heavy bleeding safety netting.

Costs marks: Routine referral. Not explaining the pathway. Being evasive about cancer.

Domain 3 (Primary focus)

Scores well: Addressing cancer fear directly. Using her nursing background constructively. Proportionate communication. Acknowledging her mother's history.

Costs marks: Being evasive. Not acknowledging family history. Being alarmist or dismissive.

Common examiner feedback (and how to fix it)

Did not gather sufficient information to make an adequate assessment of the patient's condition

Fix: Use a consistent framework for every history. After covering the presenting complaint, systematically move through PMH, drug history, social history, family history, and ICE. Keep a mental checklist.

Did not identify the patient's problems and/or did not develop a management plan adequately

Fix: Reserve the final 2 minutes to summarise your findings, share your working diagnosis with the patient, and outline your investigation and management plan including safety netting.

Common mistakes in this station

  1. Attributing PMB to atrophic vaginitis without investigation: cancer must be excluded regardless of likelihood
  2. Not arranging 2-week-wait referral: routine gynaecology is inadequate for postmenopausal bleeding
  3. Being either too alarming or too reassuring: proportionate communication is essential

Resitting PLAB 2?

If you have previously struggled with history taking stations, focus on building a consistent systematic framework that you apply to every case. Practise structuring your history into clear phases (presenting complaint, systems review, PMH, social, ICE) so that even under pressure, you cover all domains. Many resitters lose marks not on knowledge but on organisation and time management.

Example opening

Good morning/afternoon, my name is Dr [Name], I'm one of the doctors here today. Could I confirm your name and date of birth please? Thank you. So, what's brought you in to see me today?

Frequently asked questions

How do I approach the consultation in this postmenopausal bleeding station?

Postmenopausal bleeding is endometrial cancer until proven otherwise and requires urgent 2-week-wait referral. Mrs Corbett is 61, last period 8 years ago, with 1 week of vaginal bleeding. She is a retired nurse and is terrified of cancer.

What does a strong performance look like to the examiner in this station?

Strong performances show: PMB confirmed. Timing and character documented. Cervical screening status checked. Family history noted. Other causes considered. Weak performances: Not confirming PMB. Not checking screening. Missing family history.

What is the biggest pitfall in this postmenopausal bleeding station?

Attributing PMB to atrophic vaginitis without investigation: cancer must be excluded regardless of likelihood. Another frequent error: Not arranging 2-week-wait referral: routine gynaecology is inadequate for postmenopausal bleeding.

How should I prepare for postmenopausal bleeding if I have never seen it in practice?

Structure beats experience here. Focus on endometrial cancer as the primary diagnosis to exclude: commonest serious cause of PMB. The written guidance on this page covers the full approach, and practising the consultation aloud builds the fluency the examiner is listening for.

Related cases