Angry Patient · Advanced · Communication

Relative's Frustration - Delayed Cancer Recognition

Practise this PLAB 2 angry patient station on Delayed Diagnosis Complaint. 8-minute voice AI simulation with feedback on all 3 marking domains.

Clinical scenario

You are an FY2 doctor in a hospital clinic. You are seeing Ebenezer Musa, a 54-year-old man, who has come with his son Marcus (aged 28). Marcus is visibly angry about delays in his father's cancer diagnosis. The family discovered the cancer was present for at least six months before diagnosis. You have been asked to address their concerns, explain what happened, and discuss next steps.

Background notes: PMH: Type 2 diabetes, Hypertension, GORD (managed with antacids), Appendicectomy aged 22

What this station tests

  • Duty of candour: honest acknowledgement if there was a delay
  • Did the delay change the outcome: honest, proportionate communication without speculation
  • Supporting the complaint process: PALS, formal complaint, Datix if clinical error
  • Not being defensive: the patient's care going forward is the priority
  • Continuing excellent care regardless of the complaint

How to use your 8 minutes

  • 0-1 min — De-escalation: Stay calm. Introduce yourself. Acknowledge their frustration. 'I can see you're upset, and I want to help.'
  • 1-3 min — Active Listening: Let the patient express their concerns fully. Do not interrupt. Use reflective statements. Show empathy.
  • 3-5 min — Acknowledge and Explain: Validate their feelings. Explain what happened (if appropriate). Take responsibility where due. Avoid being defensive.
  • 5-7 min — Resolution: Discuss what can be done. Offer concrete actions. Involve senior/PALS if needed. Set realistic expectations.
  • 7-8 min — Closing: Summarise agreed actions. Confirm follow-up plan. Offer formal complaints process if requested.

Consultation approach

The opening

A patient and family complaining about delayed cancer diagnosis requires duty of candour, honest explanation, and support for the complaint process. Mr Musa (54) has cancer that his son Marcus believes was diagnosed late. Open with: 'Mr Musa, Marcus, I understand you have concerns about how your diagnosis was reached. I want to hear your concerns and be completely open with you.'

Core approach

Listen to the specific concerns. Marcus believes his father's symptoms were dismissed for months by the GP before cancer was eventually diagnosed. He wants to know: was there a delay? Did it affect the prognosis? Should the GP have acted sooner?

Apply duty of candour. If there was a delay: acknowledge it honestly. 'Looking at the records, I can see that there was a period where the symptoms could have been investigated sooner.' Do not blame a specific colleague but do not hide a system failure. If there was no delay: explain the clinical reasoning honestly.

The critical question: did the delay change the outcome? This requires honest, proportionate communication. Some cancers are aggressive regardless of when they are diagnosed. Others are stage-dependent. Be truthful without speculating beyond what is known.

Closing and safety netting

Offer support for the complaint process. 'If you want to make a formal complaint, I fully support your right to do so. PALS can guide you through the process.' Incident reporting through Datix if a clinical error is identified. Offer to arrange a meeting with the consultant oncologist to discuss the medical aspects in detail.

Continue to provide excellent care regardless of the complaint. 'Whatever happened in the past, my priority is your care going forward.' Macmillan for cancer support. Follow-up: complaint process plus ongoing clinical care.

How examiners mark this station

Examiners will focus primarily on Domain 3 (Interpersonal Skills): your ability to remain calm, de-escalate, actively listen, and maintain professional boundaries. Domain 2 (Clinical Management) assesses whether you offered concrete resolution and knew the complaints process. Domain 1 (Data Gathering) assesses whether you fully understood the source of the patient's anger.

Domain 1 (Supporting)

Scores well: Timeline reviewed. Clinical reasoning explained. Delay assessed objectively.

Costs marks: Not reviewing the timeline.

Domain 2 (Primary focus)

Scores well: Duty of candour applied. PALS offered. Datix if error. Ongoing care continued. Consultant meeting offered.

Costs marks: Defensive. Discouraging complaint. Not applying duty of candour.

Domain 3 (Primary focus)

Scores well: Honest without defensive. Listening to the family. Supporting their right to complain. Empathic about the diagnosis.

Costs marks: Defensive. Dismissive. Not supporting complaint.

Common examiner feedback (and how to fix it)

Did not demonstrate adequate interpersonal skills in managing the consultation

Fix: Practise staying calm under pressure. Acknowledge the anger explicitly ('I can see you are very frustrated'). Let the patient speak fully before responding. Never become defensive.

Did not identify the patient's problems and/or did not develop a management plan adequately

Fix: After de-escalation and active listening, offer concrete next steps. Explain the complaints process (PALS). Involve senior staff if needed. Document the interaction.

Common mistakes in this station

  1. Being defensive: defensiveness confirms the family's suspicion that something is being hidden
  2. Speculating about prognosis impact: only state what is known, not what is guessed
  3. Discouraging the complaint: the family has the right to complain and should be supported

Resitting PLAB 2?

If angry patient stations have caused difficulty, the key is staying calm and not becoming defensive. Practise de-escalation techniques: acknowledge the anger, validate the emotion, and listen fully before offering solutions. Many resitters lose marks by trying to explain or justify too early.

Example opening

Good morning/afternoon, I'm Dr [Name]. I can see you're upset, and I want to understand what has happened so I can help. Please, take your time and tell me what's been going on.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best approach when the patient is angry in this delayed diagnosis complaint station?

A patient and family complaining about delayed cancer diagnosis requires duty of candour, honest explanation, and support for the complaint process. Mr Musa (54) has cancer that his son Marcus believes was diagnosed late.

What does a strong performance look like to the examiner in this station?

Strong performances show: Timeline reviewed. Clinical reasoning explained. Delay assessed objectively. Weak performances: Not reviewing the timeline.

What is the biggest pitfall in this delayed diagnosis complaint station?

Being defensive: defensiveness confirms the family's suspicion that something is being hidden. Another frequent error: Speculating about prognosis impact: only state what is known, not what is guessed.

How should I prepare for delayed diagnosis complaint if I have never seen it in practice?

Structure beats experience here. Focus on did the delay change the outcome: honest, proportionate communication without speculation. The written guidance on this page covers the full approach, and practising the consultation aloud builds the fluency the examiner is listening for.

Related cases